🔗 Share this article

Eddie Howe isn't typically prone to dramatics or sweeping public statements. So by his standards, his media briefing after the weekend's loss to West Ham qualifies as a furious tirade. Newcastle scored first but West Ham were ahead by half-time, while also striking the woodwork and seeing a spot-kick overturned by VAR, prompting Howe to execute a three substitutions at the half-time.

“That was the frustrating thing about the first half,” the coach stated. “I almost could have taken anyone off and I believe this indicated of our performance level in that moment during the match and it’s very, very rare for me to feel that way. Actually, I don’t think having done so during my tenure as head coach of Newcastle, therefore I believed the squad required a significant change at the break. This explains why I made those decisions.”

Three key players were substituted at the interval and the team managed to steady somewhat in the latter period, but never really looking like they might fight back into the contest against a side that had won only one of their last nine league matches. Given the congestion the centre of the table is, with just three points separating the top spots from mid-table, and a nine-point margin between the upper and lower ranks, a sequence of twelve points from ten matches has not placed Newcastle stranded but, equally, they cannot finish the season in thirteenth place.

The Problem of Perception

The challenge partially is one of perception. In the Saudi Public Investment Fund, Newcastle possess the wealthiest owners in the globe. The expectation when the Saudi fund bought a majority stake of the club in 2021 was that it would have a game-changing impact, as Roman Abramovich achieved at Stamford Bridge or Sheikh Mansour did at the Etihad. The distinction is that those two investors assumed control before the introduction of financial fair play rules (and the current allegations against Manchester City relate to if they violated those guidelines after they were implemented).

Financial regulations limit the capacity of proprietors, no matter how wealthy, to spend money on their teams and so in that sense likely might have hindered every Middle Eastern attempt to elevate the team to the standard of Manchester City. However there is no need for the club's spending to have been so restrained as it has been; they might have spent more and remained within the threshold – or simply taken a fairly minor Uefa penalty given their major issue is more with the continental than the domestic rules.

Stadium Investment and PSR Regulations

Besides which, infrastructure spending is exempted from Profit and Sustainability calculations; the easiest way to increase revenue to create additional financial flexibility would be to expand or renovate the stadium. Considering the location of the home ground, with listed buildings on two sides, practically that probably implies constructing an completely new venue. There was talk in March of possibly undertaking the short move to Leazes Park – resistance from community organizations could surely have been surmounted with a commitment to build a replacement green space on the existing stadium site – but there has not been any progress on that plan. There has occurred significant cutbacks from the PIF on a variety of projects as it refocuses on domestic affairs; the approach to the football club seems completely in keeping with that change of approach.

The Alexander Isak Situation

The Alexander Isak saga was arose from that conflict. A more confident leadership might have framed his transfer as necessary to free up funds for additional spending; instead there was a unsuccessful effort to retain him. That meant the team started the campaign amid a sense of disappointment despite the signings of several new players. The opening was mixed: one win in their first six fixtures.

Yet it appeared a corner had been turned. They secured five victories in six matches before the weekend, a run that included convincing wins of a Belgian side and a Portuguese club in the European competition. This explains the performance against West Ham was such a shock. The issue maybe is that Newcastle’s style is extremely intense, very high-octane; a minor decrease in energy can have significant effects. Maybe the pressure of Premier League, Champions League and cup competition, five fixtures in a fortnight, had taken its toll. Woltemade started all five games and looked particularly weary.

The Nature of Modern Soccer

This is the nature of modern football. Coaches have to be prepared to rotate. The manager has been unlucky that the forward's injury has meant he is lacking forward choices but, regardless of how valid the explanations, Sunday’s showing was inexcusable –particularly after scoring first at a stadium ready to turn on its home team.

The Newcastle boss will hope it was just a blip, one of those days when all players is off-colour at once, but if the Magpies are to secure the European competition in the future, not to mention eventually mount an genuine championship bid, they cannot be as unreliable as this.